Authors
Joshua M Tybur, Yoel Inbar, Lene Aarøe, Pat Barclay, Fiona Kate Barlow, Micheal De Barra, D Vaughn Becker, Leah Borovoi, Incheol Choi, Jong An Choi, Nathan S Consedine, Alan Conway, Jane Rebecca Conway, Paul Conway, Vera Cubela Adoric, Dilara Ekin Demirci, Ana María Fernández, Diogo Conque Seco Ferreira, Keiko Ishii, Ivana Jakšić, Tingting Ji, Florian Van Leeuwen, David MG Lewis, Norman P Li, Jason C McIntyre, Sumitava Mukherjee, Justin H Park, Boguslaw Pawlowski, Michael Bang Petersen, David Pizarro, Gerasimos Prodromitis, Pavol Prokop, Markus J Rantala, Lisa M Reynolds, Bonifacio Sandin, Bariş Sevi, Delphine De Smet, Narayanan Srinivasan, Shruti Tewari, Cameron Wilson, Jose C Yong, Iris Žeželj
Publication date
2016/11/1
Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Volume
113
Issue
44
Pages
12408-12413
Publisher
National Academy of Sciences
Description
People who are more avoidant of pathogens are more politically conservative, as are nations with greater parasite stress. In the current research, we test two prominent hypotheses that have been proposed as explanations for these relationships. The first, which is an intragroup account, holds that these relationships between pathogens and politics are based on motivations to adhere to local norms, which are sometimes shaped by cultural evolution to have pathogen-neutralizing properties. The second, which is an intergroup account, holds that these same relationships are based on motivations to avoid contact with outgroups, who might pose greater infectious disease threats than ingroup members. Results from a study surveying 11,501 participants across 30 nations are more consistent with the intragroup account than with the intergroup account. National parasite stress relates to traditionalism (an aspect of …
Total citations
20172018201920202021202220232024725264261575512
Scholar articles
JM Tybur, Y Inbar, L Aarøe, P Barclay, FK Barlow… - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2016