Authors
Anne Burmeister, Ulrike Fasbender, Fabiola H Gerpott
Publication date
2019/6
Journal
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Volume
92
Issue
2
Pages
281-304
Description
The nature of the consequences of knowledge hiding, defined as an intentional attempt to withhold knowledge that has been requested, and the mechanisms through which knowledge hiding affects outcomes are undertheorized. In this research, we propose that knowledge hiding can evoke guilt and shame in the knowledge hiding perpetrator. We zoom into the three types of knowledge hiding – evasive hiding, playing dumb, and rationalized hiding – and predict that the more deceptive knowledge hiding types, namely evasive hiding and playing dumb, evoke stronger feelings of guilt and shame than rationalized hiding. We further argue that guilt and shame trigger differential emotion‐based reparatory mechanisms, such that guilt induces the motivation to correct one's transgressions through organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB), whereas shame induces the tendency to withdraw after hiding knowledge, as …
Scholar articles
A Burmeister, U Fasbender, FH Gerpott - Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 2019