Authors
Kimmo Eriksson, Pontus Strimling, Per A Andersson, Mark Aveyard, Markus Brauer, Vladimir Gritskov, Toko Kiyonari, David M Kuhlman, Angela T Maitner, Zoi Manesi, Catherine Molho, Leonard S Peperkoorn, Muhammad Rizwan, Adam W Stivers, Qirui Tian, Paul AM Van Lange, Irina Vartanova, Junhui Wu, Toshio Yamagishi
Publication date
2017/12
Journal
Management and Organization Review
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
851-870
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Description
Violators of cooperation norms may be informally punished by their peers. How such norm enforcement is judged by others can be regarded as a meta-norm (i.e., a second-order norm). We examined whether meta-norms about peer punishment vary across cultures by having students in eight countries judge animations in which an agent who over-harvested a common resource was punished either by a single peer or by the entire peer group. Whether the punishment was retributive or restorative varied between two studies, and findings were largely consistent across these two types of punishment. Across all countries, punishment was judged as more appropriate when implemented by the entire peer group than by an individual. Differences between countries were revealed in judgments of punishers vs. non-punishers. Specifically, appraisals of punishers were relatively negative in three Western countries and …
Total citations
20172018201920202021202220232024123251163
Scholar articles
K Eriksson, P Strimling, PA Andersson, M Aveyard… - Management and Organization Review, 2017