| The effects of clinical and scientific expert testimony on juror decision making in capital sentencing. DA Krauss, BD Sales Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 7 (2), 267, 2001 | 273 | 2001 |
| Mock jury research: Where do we go from here? RL Wiener, DA Krauss, JD Lieberman Behavioral sciences & the law 29 (3), 467-479, 2011 | 201 | 2011 |
| Gold versus platinum: Do jurors recognize the superiority and limitations of DNA evidence compared to other types of forensic evidence? JD Lieberman, CA Carrell, TD Miethe, DA Krauss Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 14 (1), 27, 2008 | 190 | 2008 |
| Legal standards, expertise, and experts in the resolution of contested child custody cases. DA Krauss, BD Sales Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 6 (4), 843, 2000 | 139 | 2000 |
| The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty cases DA Krauss, JD Lieberman, J Olson Behavioral Sciences & the Law 22 (6), 801-822, 2004 | 131 | 2004 |
| Forensic and legal psychology M Costanzo, D Krauss Macmillan, 2010 | 96 | 2010 |
| Reality check: A comparison of college students and a community sample of mock jurors in a simulated sexual violent predator civil commitment JG McCabe, DA Krauss, JD Lieberman Behavioral Sciences & the Law 28 (6), 730-750, 2010 | 95 | 2010 |
| Predictors of treatment completion in a correctional sex offender treatment program TM Geer, JV Becker, SR Gray, D Krauss International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology 45 (3 …, 2001 | 88 | 2001 |
| Deliberating on dangerousness and death: Jurors' ability to differentiate between expert actuarial and clinical predictions of dangerousness DA Krauss, DH Lee International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 26 (2), 113-137, 2003 | 81 | 2003 |
| The danger of dangerousness in capital sentencing: Exacerbating the problem of arbitrary and capricious decision-making M Dorland, D Krauss Law & Psychol. Rev. 29, 63, 2005 | 77 | 2005 |
| The problem of" helpfulness" in applying Daubert to expert testimony: Child custody determinations in family law as an exemplar. DA Krauss, BD Sales Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 5 (1), 78, 1999 | 66 | 1999 |
| Dangerously misunderstood: Representative jurors' reactions to expert testimony on future dangerousness in a sexually violent predator trial. DA Krauss, JG McCabe, JD Lieberman Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 18 (1), 18, 2012 | 65 | 2012 |
| Educational and training models in forensic psychology. D DeMatteo, G Marczyk, DA Krauss, J Burl Training and Education in Professional Psychology 3 (3), 184, 2009 | 63 | 2009 |
| Determining dangerousness in sexually violent predator evaluations: cognitive–experiential self‐theory and juror judgments of expert testimony JD Lieberman, DA Krauss, M Kyger, M Lehoux Behavioral Sciences & the Law 25 (4), 507-526, 2007 | 61 | 2007 |
| The good, the bad, and the ugly: Professional perceptions of jury decision‐making research practices JD Lieberman, DA Krauss, M Heen, M Sakiyama Behavioral Sciences & the Law 34 (4), 495-514, 2016 | 46 | 2016 |
| Beyond prediction to explanation in risk assessment research DA Krauss, BD Sales, JV Becker, AJ Figueredo International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 23 (2), 91-112, 2000 | 41 | 2000 |
| A national survey of United States sexually violent person legislation: Policy, procedures, and practice D DeMatteo, M Murphy, M Galloway, DA Krauss International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 14 (4), 245-266, 2015 | 40 | 2015 |
| Adjusting risk of recidivism: Do judicial departures worsen or improve recidivism prediction under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines? DA Krauss Behavioral sciences & the law 22 (6), 731-750, 2004 | 38 | 2004 |
| The impact of case factors on jurors’ decisions in a sexual violent predator hearing. D Krauss, N Scurich Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 20 (2), 135, 2014 | 30 | 2014 |
| Risk assessment in the law: Legal admissibility, scientific validity, and some disparities between research and practice DA Krauss, N Scurich Behavioral sciences & the law 31 (2), 215-229, 2013 | 30 | 2013 |
