Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Sign in
Scholar Home  
  Advanced Scholar Search
Scholar Preferences
Scholar Results 1 - 10 of about 18 citing Sawaya: Update on the methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: estimating certainty.... (0.11 sec) 

The Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) initiative: …


SM Teutsch, LA Bradley, GE Palomaki, JE …, 2009 - pubmedcentral.nih.gov
The Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP)
Initiative, established by the National Office of Public Health Genomics at the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, supports the development and ...
Cited by 20 - Related articles - All 5 versions

Diagnostic markers for ovarian cancer screening: not ready for routine clinical use


RJ Coates, K Kolor, SL Stewart, LC … - Clinical Cancer Research, 2008 - AACR
To the Editor: Given the number of women who are diagnosed with ovarian cancer
each year (1) and the poor survival after diagnosis, 1 the development of an
effective screening method would clearly be of public health benefit. ...
Cited by 3 - Related articles - All 3 versions

Grading Evidence-Based Guidelines—What Are the Issues?


K Uhlig, EM Balk, J Lau - American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2008 - Elsevier
Clinical practice guidelines aim to inform decisionmaking in clinical practice.
Guidelines build on summaries of the best available evidence and integrate
judgments and values of an expert workgroup in the interpretation. When ...
Cited by 1 - Related articles - All 23 versions

'Marginal Medicine': Targeting Comparative Effectiveness Research To Reduce Waste


A Hoffman, SD Pearson - Health Affairs, 2009 - healthaff.highwire.org
Many policymakers believe that comparative effectiveness research will reduce
"waste" in the US health care system by providing guidance on what health care
options work best for different patients. How such research will produce ...
Cited by 1 - Related articles - All 3 versions

Guidance for considering ethical, legal, and social issues in health technology assessment: …


BK Potter, D Avard, ID Graham, VA Entwistle, … - International Journal of Technology Assessment in …, 2008 - Cambridge Univ Press
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 24:4 (2008),
412–422. Copyright c 2008 Cambridge University Press. Printed in the USA
doi:10.1017/S0266462308080549 ... Ian D. Graham University of Ottawa and ...
Cited by 1 - Related articles - All 3 versions

The US Preventive Services Task Force: An evidence-based prevention resource for nurse …


T Trinite, C Loveland-Cherry, L Marion - Journal of the American Academy of Nurse …, 2009 - interscience.wiley.com
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to
display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be
degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the ...
Related articles - All 3 versions

Staying at the cutting edge: a review and analysis of evidence reporting and grading; the …


M Faraday, H Hubbard, B Kosiak, R … - BJU international, 2009 - interscience.wiley.com
The American Urological Association (AUA), as the premier urological
organization in the USA, has been a pioneering force in the development of
practice guidelines. Recently the AUA evaluated their guidelines ...
Related articles - All 3 versions

[PDF] Good Research Practices for Comparative Effectiveness Research: Defining, Reporting and …


ML Berger, M Mamdani, MA PharmD, D Atkins - ispor.org
Page 1. Good Research Practices for Comparative Effectiveness Research:
Defining, Reporting and Interpreting Nonrandomized Studies ...
Related articles - View as HTML

[PDF] Pulmonary Perspective


PA Flume, PJ Mogayzel Jr, KA Robinson, CH … - Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2009 - thoracic.org
Patrick A. Flume1, Peter J. Mogayzel, Jr.2, Karen A. Robinson3, Christopher H.
Goss4, Randall L. Rosenblatt5, Robert J. Kuhn6, Bruce C. Marshall7, and the
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pulmonary Therapies Committee* ...
Related articles - View as HTML

A Clinician's Perspective on Rating the Strength of Evidence in a Systematic Review


CI Coleman, R Talati, CM White - Pharmacotherapy, 2009 - PPI
Systematic review is a means of reviewing clearly formulated questions by using
an explicit methodology to minimize bias in the location, selection, critical
evaluation, and synthesis of research evidence from existing studies. It is ...
Related articles - All 2 versions


Result Page: 

1

2

Next


 


Go to Google Home - About Google - About Google Scholar

©2009 Google