- ►nih.gov PH Scanlon, R Malhotra, RH Greenwood, SJ … - British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2003 - bjo.bmj.com Results: In comparison with seven field stereophotography, the ophthalmologist's
examination gave a sensitivity of 87.4% (confidence interval 83.5 to 91.5), a
specificity of 94.9% (91.5 to 98.3), and a kappa statistic of 0.80. Two ... Cited by 39 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 9 versions
PH Scanlon, R Malhotra, G Thomas, C Foy, JN … - Diabetic Medicine, 2003 - interscience.wiley.com It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to
display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be
degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the ... Cited by 47 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 4 versions
JA Olson, FM Strachan, JH Hipwell, KA … - Diabetic Medicine, 2003 - interscience.wiley.com Methods A group of 586 patients recruited from a diabetic clinic underwent three
or four mydriatic screening methods for retinal examination. The respective
performances of digital imaging (n = 586; graded manually), colour slides ... Cited by 54 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 4 versions
K Facey, E Cummins, K Macpherson, A Morris, … - Citeseer This report should be referenced as: Facey K, Cummins E, Macpherson K, Morris A,
Reay L and Slattery J. 2002. Organisation of Services for diabetic retinopathy
screening. Health Technology Assessment Report 1. Glasgow: Health ... Cited by 36 - Related articles - View as HTML - All 20 versions
- Free from Publisher PH Scanlon, C Foy, R Malhotra, SJ Aldington - Diabetes Care, 2005 - Am Diabetes Assoc RESULTS—The ungradable image rate for nonmydriatic photography was 19.7% (95%
CI 18.4–21.0) and for mydriatic photography was 3.7% (3.1–4.3). The odds of
having one eye ungradable increased by 2.6% (1.6–3.7) for each extra year ... Cited by 17 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 10 versions
JT Gillow, JA Gray - Eye(London. 1987), 2001 - cat.inist.fr The national screening committee review of diabetic retinopathy screening. JT GILLOW,
JA GRAY Eye(London. 1987) 15, 1-2, Nature Publishing Group, 2001. ... Cited by 18 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 2 versions
P Massin, A Erginay, A Ben Mehidi, E Vicaut, … - Diabetic Medicine, 2003 - interscience.wiley.com Methods Fundus colour photographs were taken with a Topcon non-mydriatic camera
of 147 eyes of 74 diabetic patients, without pupillary dilation (five
overlapping fields of 45°; posterior pole, nasal, temporal, superior and ... Cited by 37 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 4 versions
M Baeza Díaz, V Gil Guillén, D Orozco … - Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología, 2004 - europa.sim.ucm.es Objetivo: Analizar la validez de la cámara no midriática para detectar
retinopatía diabética y los grados de severidad susceptibles de derivación al
oftalmólogo. Analizar los indicadores de gravedad de la retinopatía ... Cited by 13 - Related articles - Cached
- ►nih.gov - Free from Publisher H Murgatroyd, A Ellingford, A Cox, M Binnie, … - British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2004 - bjo.bmj.com Method: Slit lamp examination findings were compared to digital fundal
photographs for the detection of any retinopathy and for referable retinopathy
in 398 patients (794 eyes). A Topcon TRC-NW6S digital non-mydriatic fundus ... Cited by 40 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 10 versions
- ►diabetesjournals.org C Stellingwerf, PLLJ Hardus, JMM Hooymans - Diabetes Care, 2001 - Am Diabetes Assoc RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Type 1 and 2 diabetic patients without a known
history of more than minimal retinopathy (n = 469) had a routine examination by
an ophthalmologist, including visual acuity measurement, indirect ... Cited by 31 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 5 versions
