- ►annals.org M Shuchman, MS Wilkes - Annals of internal medicine, 1997 - Am Coll Physicians The public is poorly served by the coverage of medical science in the general
press.Scientists and physicians blame the press, claiming that journalists are
careless in their reporting, subject to competitive pressures, and ignorant ... Cited by 67 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 5 versions
LK Altman - The Lancet, 1996 - Elsevier Peer review is one of the main reasons put forward in support of the Ingelfinger
rule. As the second of the two-part article The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and
journal peer review shows, however, the economic interests in controlling ... Cited by 63 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 11 versions
DP Phillips, EJ Kanter, B Bednarczyk, PL … - New England Journal of Medicine, 1991 - content.nejm.org BACKGROUND. Efficient, undistorted communication of the results of medical
research is important to physicians, the scientific community, and the public.
Information that first appears in the scientific literature is frequently ... Cited by 165 - Related articles - All 4 versions
DF Ransohoff, RM Ransohoff - Effective clinical practice: ECP - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov 1: Eff Clin Pract. 2001 Jul-Aug;4(4):185-8. Sensationalism in the media: when
scientists and journalists may be complicit collaborators. ... Cited by 34 - Related articles
V Entwistle - British Medical Journal, 1995 - bmj.com Newspapers are important sources of information about medical advances for many
lay people and can influence those working in the health service. Medical
journalists on newspapers routinely use general medical journals to obtain ... Cited by 88 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 7 versions
JA Winsten - Health Affairs, 1985 - Health Affairs Prologue: In the fast-paced world of journalism, science writers are a special
breed: well-trained, conversant in a wide range of health and medical subjects,
and prepared at a moment's notice to translate for readers the meaning of ... Cited by 50 - Related articles - All 4 versions
MS Wilkes, RL Kravitz - JAMA, 1992 - Am Med Assoc OBJECTIVE--To study the experience of recently published authors with the news
media. DESIGN--A self-administered questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS--All first
authors of scientific articles published in JAMA and The New England ... Cited by 36 - Related articles - All 3 versions
M Shuchman - JAMA, 2002 - Am Med Assoc On the other hand, reporters are not obligated to grant sources the right to not
be quoted on public record, especially if these sources say things to a reporter
without first clarifying that what they say will be considered "off the ... Cited by 11 - Related articles - All 3 versions
- ►ima.org.il [PDF] R Moynihan, L Bero, D Ross-Degnan, D Henry … - New England Journal of Medicine, 2000 - content.nejm.org Results Of the 207 stories, 83 (40 percent) did not report benefits
quantitatively. Of the 124 that did, 103 (83 percent) reported relative benefits
only, 3 (2 percent) absolute benefits only, and 18 (15 percent) both ... Cited by 200 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 8 versions
