- ►annals.org KG Shojania, M Sampson, MT Ansari, J Ji, S … - Annals of internal medicine, 2007 - Am Coll Physicians Add to CiteULike Add to Complore Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg
Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this? ...
Background: Systematic reviews are often advocated as the best source of ... Cited by 36 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 3 versions
D Moher, A Tsertsvadze, AC Tricco, M … - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2007 - Elsevier Systematic reviews (SRs) are convenient summaries of evidence for health care
practitioners. They form a basis for clinical practice guidelines and suggest
directions for new research. SRs are most helpful if they are current; ... Cited by 16 - Related articles - All 12 versions
SD French, S McDonald, JE McKenzie, SE … - BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2005 - biomedcentral.com Cochrane systematic reviews aim to provide readers with the most up-to-date
evidence on the effects of healthcare interventions. The policy of updating
Cochrane reviews every two years consumes valuable time and resources and ... Cited by 20 - Related articles - Cached - All 8 versions
AP Jones, T Remmington, PR Williamson, D … - Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2005 - Elsevier Extracting data from primary articles is an essential component in conducting
systematic reviews. Incorrect data extraction can lead to false conclusions. The
objective of this study was to retrospectively repeat the data extraction ... Cited by 14 - Related articles - All 11 versions
- ►annals.org S Stranges, JR Marshall, R Natarajan, RP … - Annals of Internal Medicine, 2007 - Am Coll Physicians Add to CiteULike Add to Complore Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg
Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this? ...
Background: Findings from animal models suggest that selenium ... Cited by 67 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 14 versions
A Figures - Ann Intern Med, 2007 - ipasviperugia.it Background: Systematic reviews are often advocated as the best source of
evidence to guide clinical decisions and health care policy, yet we know little
about the extent to which they require updating. Related articles - View as HTML
[CITATION] How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date
KG Shojania, M Sampson, MT Ansari, J Ji, S … - A survival analysis. Ann Intern Med, 2007 Cited by 32 - Related articles
D Moher, A Tsertsvadze, AC Tricco, M … - Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online), 2008 - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews are most helpful if they are up-to-date. We did a
systematic review of strategies and methods describing when and how to update
systematic reviews. OBJECTIVES: To identify, describe and assess strategies ... Cited by 11 - Related articles
D Moher, J Tetzlaff, AC Tricco, M Sampson, … - PLoS Med, 2007 - medicine.plosjournals.org We searched Medline for SRs indexed during November 2004 and written in English.
Citations were screened and those meeting our inclusion criteria were retained.
Data were collected using a 51-item data collection form designed to assess ... Cited by 79 - Related articles - Cached - All 15 versions
PC Gotzsche, A Hrobjartsson, K Maric, B … - JAMA, 2007 - Am Med Assoc You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web
standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do
to make your experience on this site better. ... Add to CiteULike Add to ... Cited by 28 - Related articles - BL Direct - All 5 versions
