Theo dõi
Best Moving
Best Moving
Best Moving trang chia sẻ thông tin top các đơn vị cung cấp dịch vụ vận tải, chuyển nhà, chuyển văn
Không có email được xác minh - Trang chủ
Tiêu đề
Trích dẫn bởi
Trích dẫn bởi
Năm
An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies
PC Austin
Multivariate behavioral research 46 (3), 399-424, 2011
105622011
Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity‐score matched samples
PC Austin
Statistics in medicine 28 (25), 3083-3107, 2009
50362009
Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies
PC Austin, EA Stuart
Statistics in medicine 34 (28), 3661-3679, 2015
34262015
Optimal caliper widths for propensity‐score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies
PC Austin
Pharmaceutical statistics 10 (2), 150-161, 2011
32352011
Outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in a population-based study
RS Bhatia, JV Tu, DS Lee, PC Austin, J Fang, A Haouzi, Y Gong, PP Liu
New England Journal of Medicine 355 (3), 260-269, 2006
26652006
Rates of hyperkalemia after publication of the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study
DN Juurlink, MM Mamdani, DS Lee, A Kopp, PC Austin, A Laupacis, ...
New England Journal of Medicine 351 (6), 543-551, 2004
20382004
Using the standardized difference to compare the prevalence of a binary variable between two groups in observational research
PC Austin
Communications in statistics-simulation and computation 38 (6), 1228-1234, 2009
19522009
Introduction to the analysis of survival data in the presence of competing risks
PC Austin, DS Lee, JP Fine
Circulation 133 (6), 601-609, 2016
19002016
A modification of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data
C Van Walraven, PC Austin, A Jennings, H Quan, AJ Forster
Medical care 47 (6), 626-633, 2009
18482009
Predicting mortality among patients hospitalized for heart failure: derivation and validation of a clinical model
DS Lee, PC Austin, JL Rouleau, PP Liu, D Naimark, JV Tu
Jama 290 (19), 2581-2587, 2003
16502003
A critical appraisal of propensity‐score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003
PC Austin
Statistics in medicine 27 (12), 2037-2049, 2008
14352008
A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study
PC Austin, P Grootendorst, GM Anderson
Statistics in medicine 26 (4), 734-753, 2007
13192007
A population-based study of the drug interaction between proton pump inhibitors and clopidogrel
DN Juurlink, T Gomes, DT Ko, PE Szmitko, PC Austin, JV Tu, DA Henry, ...
Cmaj 180 (7), 713-718, 2009
12732009
The use of propensity score methods with survival or time‐to‐event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments
PC Austin
Statistics in medicine 33 (7), 1242-1258, 2014
12512014
The number of subjects per variable required in linear regression analyses
PC Austin, EW Steyerberg
Journal of clinical epidemiology 68 (6), 627-636, 2015
10872015
Derivation and validation of an index to predict early death or unplanned readmission after discharge from hospital to the community
C Van Walraven, IA Dhalla, C Bell, E Etchells, IG Stiell, K Zarnke, ...
Cmaj 182 (6), 551-557, 2010
10342010
A comparison of 12 algorithms for matching on the propensity score
PC Austin
Statistics in medicine 33 (6), 1057-1069, 2014
9612014
Effects of socioeconomic status on access to invasive cardiac procedures and on mortality after acute myocardial infarction
DA Alter, CD Naylor, P Austin, JV Tu
New England Journal of Medicine 341 (18), 1359-1367, 1999
8061999
Proportion of hospital readmissions deemed avoidable: a systematic review
C Van Walraven, C Bennett, A Jennings, PC Austin, AJ Forster
Cmaj 183 (7), E391-E402, 2011
8052011
Practical recommendations for reporting f Ine‐G Ray model analyses for competing risk data
PC Austin, JP Fine
Statistics in medicine 36 (27), 4391-4400, 2017
8012017
Hệ thống không thể thực hiện thao tác ngay bây giờ. Hãy thử lại sau.
Bài viết 1–20