| The ethics of germline gene editing C Gyngell, T Douglas, J Savulescu Journal of Applied Philosophy 34 (4), 498-513, 2017 | 174 | 2017 |
| The moral imperative to continue gene editing research on human embryos J Savulescu, J Pugh, T Douglas, C Gyngell Protein & cell 6 (7), 476-479, 2015 | 150 | 2015 |
| Sex selection and non‐invasive prenatal testing: A review of current practices, evidence, and ethical issues H Bowman‐Smart, J Savulescu, C Gyngell, C Mand, MB Delatycki Prenatal Diagnosis 40 (4), 398-407, 2020 | 64 | 2020 |
| Moral reasons to edit the human genome: picking up from the Nuffield report C Gyngell, H Bowman-Smart, J Savulescu Journal of medical ethics 45 (8), 514-523, 2019 | 63 | 2019 |
| ‘Is it better not to know certain things?’: views of women who have undergone non-invasive prenatal testing on its possible future applications H Bowman-Smart, J Savulescu, C Mand, C Gyngell, MD Pertile, S Lewis, ... Journal of medical ethics 45 (4), 231-238, 2019 | 51 | 2019 |
| Genome editing technologies and human germline genetic modification: The Hinxton Group Consensus Statement S Chan, PJ Donovan, T Douglas, C Gyngell, J Harris, R Lovell-Badge, ... The American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12), 42-47, 2015 | 49 | 2015 |
| Rapid challenges: ethics and genomic neonatal intensive care C Gyngell, AJ Newson, D Wilkinson, Z Stark, J Savulescu Pediatrics 143 (Supplement_1), S14-S21, 2019 | 41 | 2019 |
| Germline gene editing and the precautionary principle JJ Koplin, C Gyngell, J Savulescu Bioethics 34 (1), 49-59, 2020 | 40 | 2020 |
| Collective reflective equilibrium in practice (CREP) and controversial novel technologies J Savulescu, C Gyngell, G Kahane Bioethics 35 (7), 652-663, 2021 | 35 | 2021 |
| ‘Small cost to pay for peace of mind’: Women's experiences with non‐invasive prenatal testing H Bowman‐Smart, J Savulescu, C Mand, C Gyngell, MD Pertile, S Lewis, ... Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 59 (5), 649-655, 2019 | 35 | 2019 |
| Clarity and Moral Significance C Gyngell, MJ Selgelid The ethics of human enhancement: Understanding the debate, 111, 2016 | 35 | 2016 |
| Enhancing the species: genetic engineering technologies and human persistence C Gyngell Philosophy & technology 25, 495-512, 2012 | 35 | 2012 |
| CRISPR: A path through the thicket DJH Mathews, S Chan, PJ Donovan, T Douglas, C Gyngell, J Harris, ... Nature 527 (7577), 159, 2015 | 34 | 2015 |
| Stocking the genetic supermarket: reproductive genetic technologies and collective action problems C Gyngell, T Douglas Bioethics 29 (4), 241-250, 2015 | 34 | 2015 |
| From public preferences to ethical policy J Savulescu, G Kahane, C Gyngell Nature human behaviour 3 (12), 1241-1243, 2019 | 33 | 2019 |
| Ethical issues in genetic modification and why application matters M Munsie, C Gyngell Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 52, 7-12, 2018 | 33 | 2018 |
| Drawing the line on in vitro gametogenesis L Notini, C Gyngell, J Savulescu Bioethics 34 (1), 123-134, 2020 | 26 | 2020 |
| Non-invasive prenatal testing for “non-medical” traits: Ensuring consistency in ethical decision-making H Bowman-Smart, C Gyngell, C Mand, DJ Amor, MB Delatycki, ... The American Journal of Bioethics 23 (3), 3-20, 2023 | 24 | 2023 |
| Selecting against disability: the liberal eugenic challenge and the argument from cognitive diversity C Gyngell, T Douglas Journal of Applied Philosophy 35 (2), 319-340, 2018 | 21 | 2018 |
| Twenty-first century eugenics C Gyngell, M Selgelid The Oxford handbook of reproductive ethics, 141, 2016 | 21 | 2016 |
