| An Uncertain Privilege: Why the Common Interest Doctrine Does Not Work and How Uniformity Can Fix It KT Schaffzin BU Pub. Int. LJ 15, 49, 2005 | 51 | 2005 |
| First-generation students in law school: A proven success model JM O'Bryant, KT Schaffzin Ark. L. Rev. 70, 913, 2017 | 22 | 2017 |
| Learning Outcomes in a Flipped Classroom:A Comparison of Civil Procedure II Test Scores Between Students in a Traditional & a Flipped Class KT Schaffzin The University of Memphis Law Reviewq 46 (3), 661-693, 2016 | 22 | 2016 |
| The Future of Law Reviews: Online-Only Journals KT Schaffzin Touro Law Review 32 (2), 243-251, 2016 | 19 | 2016 |
| The Restyled Federal Rules of Evidence RC Park William & Mary Law Review 53, 1435, 2012 | 9 | 2012 |
| The Great and Powerful Oz Revealed: The Ethics and Wisdom of the SCOTUS Leaks in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius KT Schaffzin Charleston L. Rev. 7, 317, 2012 | 7 | 2012 |
| Beyond Bobby Jo Clary: The Unavailability of Same-Sex Marital Privileges Infringes the Rights of so Many More Than Criminal Defendants KT Schaffzin U. Kan. L. Rev. 63, 103, 2014 | 6 | 2014 |
| Federal Rules of Evidence with Objections: As Amended to December 1, 2019 AJ Bocchino, DA Sonenshein, KT Schaffzin Aspen Publishing, 2020 | 5 | 2020 |
| Is Evidence Obsolete KT Schaffzin Rev. Litig. 36, 529, 2017 | 5 | 2017 |
| Sweet Caroline: The Backslide from Federal Rule of Evidence 613 (b) to the Rule in Queen Caroline's Case KT Schaffzin U. Mich. JL Reform 47, 283, 2013 | 4 | 2013 |
| Out with the Old: An Argument for Restyling Archaic Sacred Phrases Retained in the Proposed Amendments to the Federal Rules of Evidence KT Schaffzin Tenn. L. Rev. 77, 849, 2009 | 3 | 2009 |
| Eyes Wide Shut: How Ignorance of the Common Interest Doctrine Can Compromise Informed Consent KT Schaffzin U. Mich. JL Reform 42, 71, 2008 | 3 | 2008 |
| The Great and Powerful Oz Revealed: The Ethics and Wisdom of the SCOTUS Leaks in National Federation of Independent Business v KT Schaffzin Sebelius 7, 320-22, 0 | 2 | |
| Note: A Reexamination of the Evidentiary Weight of Adverse Inferences Drawn from an Employee's Invocation of His Fifth Amendment Silence KM Traylor Temple Law Review 73 (1), 379-412, 2000 | 1* | 2000 |
| The Restyled Federal Rules of Evidence KT Schaffzin William & Mary Law Review 53 (5), 1435-1547, 2012 | | 2012 |
| Deference to a Hearing Panel KT Schaffzin North Dakota Law Review 83 (3), 2007 | | 2007 |
| CASE COMMENTS RC Speciale, BD Venhuizen, R Fabrikant, N Nwabuzor NORTH DAKOTA LAW REVIEW 83 (3), 2007 | | 2007 |
| Deference to a Hearing Panel: Emerging Trends in the Disciplinary Decisions of the Supreme Court of North Dakota-2004-2007 KT Schaffzin NDL Rev. 83, 887, 2007 | | 2007 |
| JOURNAL of LAW REFORM KT Schaffzin, JK Grant, S a Yakren | | |
| THE REVIEW OF LITIGATION KT Schaffzin | | |
