| The purpose of senatorial grandstanding during Supreme court confirmation hearings JA Schoenherr, EA Lane, MT Armaly Journal of Law and Courts 8 (2), 333-358, 2020 | 15 | 2020 |
| Friends with benefits: Case significance, amicus curiae, and agenda setting on the us supreme court JA Schoenherr, RC Black International Review of Law and Economics 58, 43-53, 2019 | 11 | 2019 |
| The use of precedent in US Supreme Court litigant briefs JA Schoenherr, RC Black Research Handbook on Law and Courts, 114-129, 2019 | 3 | 2019 |
| Confessions at the Supreme Court: Judicial Response to Solicitor General Error JA Schoenherr, NW Waterbury Journal of Law and Courts 10 (1), 13-36, 2022 | 2 | 2022 |
| “A Matter of Great Importance”: Interest Groups, the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings EA Lane, JA Schoenherr | 2 | 2019 |
| " We Shall Not Surrender": Kennedy, the Berlin Crisis, and the Effective Use of the Rhetorical Presidency JA SCHOENHERR | 2 | |
| Attorneys, Merits Briefs, and US Supreme Court Decision Making JA Schoenherr Michigan State University, 2020 | 1 | 2020 |
| A Matter of Opinion? How Unexpected Opinion Authors Influence Support for Supreme Court Decisions JM King, JA Schoenherr Journal of Law and Courts, 1-21, 2024 | | 2024 |
| The Rights Paradox: How Group Attitudes Shape US Supreme Court Legitimacy JA Schoenherr Political Science Quarterly 137 (3), 605-607, 2022 | | 2022 |
| 2.3 Judicial Discretion and US Supreme Court Agenda Setting EA Lane, JA Schoenherr, RA Schutte, RC Black Open Judicial Politics, 2020 | | 2020 |
Elizabeth A. LaneAssistant Professor, Department of Political Science, North Carolina State UniversityVerified email at ncsu.edu
