Federal Rules of Evidence After Sixteen Years--The Effect of Plain Meaning Jurisprudence, the Need for an Advisory Committee on the Rules of Evidence, and Suggestions for … ER Becker, A Orenstein Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 60, 857, 1991 | 234 | 1991 |
Apology excepted: incorporating a feminist analysis into evidence policy where you least expect it A Orenstein Sw. UL Rev. 28, 221, 1998 | 133 | 1998 |
No bad men: A feminist analysis of character evidence in rape trials A Orenstein Hastings LJ 49, 663, 1997 | 107 | 1997 |
My God: A Feminist Critique of the Excited Utterance Exception to the Hearsay Rule A Orenstein Calif. L. Rev. 85, 159, 1997 | 103 | 1997 |
Special issues raised by rape trials A Orenstein Fordham L. Rev. 76, 1585, 2007 | 98 | 2007 |
Facing the unfaceable: Dealing with prosecutorial denial in postconviction cases of actual innocence A Orenstein San Diego L. Rev. 48, 401, 2011 | 66 | 2011 |
Deviance, Due Process, and the False Promise of Federal Rule of Evidence 403 A Orenstein Cornell L. Rev. 90, 1487, 2004 | 60 | 2004 |
Empirical fallacies of evidence law: A critical look at the admission of prior sex crimes TR Lave, A Orenstein U. Cin. L. Rev. 81, 795, 2012 | 43 | 2012 |
Her Last Words: Dying Declarations and Modern Confrontation Jurisprudence A Orenstein U. Ill. L. Rev., 1411, 2010 | 35 | 2010 |
Friends, Gangbangers, Custody Disputants, Lend Me Your Passwords A Orenstein Miss. CL Rev. 31, 185, 2012 | 28 | 2012 |
Sex, Threats, and Absent Victims: The Lessons of Regina v. Bedingfield for Modern Confrontation and Domestic Violence Cases A Orenstein Fordham L. Rev. 79, 115, 2010 | 26 | 2010 |
Presidential Immunity from Civil Liability Nixon v. Fitzgerald AA Orenstein Cornell L. Rev. 68, 236, 1982 | 25* | 1982 |
Evidence law: a student's guide to the law of evidence as applied in American trials A Orenstein, RC Park, DA Nance West Academic Publishing, 2022 | 15 | 2022 |
Feminism and evidence A Orenstein Feminist Jurisprudence, Women and the Law—Critical Essays, Research Agenda …, 1999 | 14 | 1999 |
My God!”: A Feminist Critique of the Excited Utterance Exception to the Hearsay Rule’(1997) A Orenstein California Law Review 85, 159, 0 | 11 | |
Honoring Margaret Berger with a Sensible Idea-Insisting That Judges Employ a Balancing Test Before Admitting the Accused's Convictions Under Federal Rule of Evidence 609 (a)(2) A Orenstein Brook. L. Rev. 75, 1291, 2009 | 9 | 2009 |
Children as Witnesses: A Symposium on Child Competence and the Accused's Right to Confront Child Witnesses AA Orenstein Ind. LJ 82, 909, 2007 | 8 | 2007 |
Evidence and feminism A Orenstein Feminist Jurisprudence, Women and The Law: Critical Essays and Articles …, 1999 | 8 | 1999 |
Evidence in a Differnet Voice: Some Thoughts on Professor Jonakait's Critique of a Feminist Approach A Orenstein Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 4, 295, 1997 | 7 | 1997 |
Debunked, Discredited, but Still Defended: Why Prosecutors Resist Challenges to Bad Science and Some Suggestions for Crafting Remedies for Wrongful Conviction Based on Changed … A Orenstein Seton Hall L. Rev. 48, 1139, 2017 | 5 | 2017 |