Follow
Aviva Orenstein
Aviva Orenstein
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
Verified email at indiana.edu - Homepage
Title
Cited by
Cited by
Year
Federal Rules of Evidence After Sixteen Years--The Effect of Plain Meaning Jurisprudence, the Need for an Advisory Committee on the Rules of Evidence, and Suggestions for …
ER Becker, A Orenstein
Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 60, 857, 1991
2341991
Apology excepted: incorporating a feminist analysis into evidence policy where you least expect it
A Orenstein
Sw. UL Rev. 28, 221, 1998
1331998
No bad men: A feminist analysis of character evidence in rape trials
A Orenstein
Hastings LJ 49, 663, 1997
1071997
My God: A Feminist Critique of the Excited Utterance Exception to the Hearsay Rule
A Orenstein
Calif. L. Rev. 85, 159, 1997
1031997
Special issues raised by rape trials
A Orenstein
Fordham L. Rev. 76, 1585, 2007
982007
Facing the unfaceable: Dealing with prosecutorial denial in postconviction cases of actual innocence
A Orenstein
San Diego L. Rev. 48, 401, 2011
662011
Deviance, Due Process, and the False Promise of Federal Rule of Evidence 403
A Orenstein
Cornell L. Rev. 90, 1487, 2004
602004
Empirical fallacies of evidence law: A critical look at the admission of prior sex crimes
TR Lave, A Orenstein
U. Cin. L. Rev. 81, 795, 2012
432012
Her Last Words: Dying Declarations and Modern Confrontation Jurisprudence
A Orenstein
U. Ill. L. Rev., 1411, 2010
352010
Friends, Gangbangers, Custody Disputants, Lend Me Your Passwords
A Orenstein
Miss. CL Rev. 31, 185, 2012
282012
Sex, Threats, and Absent Victims: The Lessons of Regina v. Bedingfield for Modern Confrontation and Domestic Violence Cases
A Orenstein
Fordham L. Rev. 79, 115, 2010
262010
Presidential Immunity from Civil Liability Nixon v. Fitzgerald
AA Orenstein
Cornell L. Rev. 68, 236, 1982
25*1982
Evidence law: a student's guide to the law of evidence as applied in American trials
A Orenstein, RC Park, DA Nance
West Academic Publishing, 2022
152022
Feminism and evidence
A Orenstein
Feminist Jurisprudence, Women and the Law—Critical Essays, Research Agenda …, 1999
141999
My God!”: A Feminist Critique of the Excited Utterance Exception to the Hearsay Rule’(1997)
A Orenstein
California Law Review 85, 159, 0
11
Honoring Margaret Berger with a Sensible Idea-Insisting That Judges Employ a Balancing Test Before Admitting the Accused's Convictions Under Federal Rule of Evidence 609 (a)(2)
A Orenstein
Brook. L. Rev. 75, 1291, 2009
92009
Children as Witnesses: A Symposium on Child Competence and the Accused's Right to Confront Child Witnesses
AA Orenstein
Ind. LJ 82, 909, 2007
82007
Evidence and feminism
A Orenstein
Feminist Jurisprudence, Women and The Law: Critical Essays and Articles …, 1999
81999
Evidence in a Differnet Voice: Some Thoughts on Professor Jonakait's Critique of a Feminist Approach
A Orenstein
Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 4, 295, 1997
71997
Debunked, Discredited, but Still Defended: Why Prosecutors Resist Challenges to Bad Science and Some Suggestions for Crafting Remedies for Wrongful Conviction Based on Changed …
A Orenstein
Seton Hall L. Rev. 48, 1139, 2017
52017
The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later.
Articles 1–20