Competing for the people's affection: Federalism's forgotten marketplace TE Pettys Vand. L. Rev. 56, 329, 2003 | 111 | 2003 |
The emotional juror TE Pettys Fordham L. Rev. 76, 1609, 2007 | 61 | 2007 |
The Mobility Paradox TE Pettys Geo. LJ 92, 481, 2003 | 55 | 2003 |
Popular constitutionalism and relaxing the dead hand: can the people be trusted TE Pettys Wash. UL Rev. 86, 313, 2008 | 50 | 2008 |
Letter from Iowa: Same-Sex Marriage and the Ouster of Three Justices TE Pettys U. Kan. L. Rev. 59, 715, 2010 | 48 | 2010 |
The myth of the written constitution TE Pettys Notre Dame L. Rev. 84, 991, 2008 | 42 | 2008 |
Intended Relationship between Administrative Regulations and Section 1983's Laws TE Pettys Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 67, 51, 1998 | 42 | 1998 |
Judicial Discretion in Constitutional Cases TE Pettys JL & Pol. 26, 123, 2010 | 37 | 2010 |
State Habeas Relief for Federal Extrajudicial Detainees TE Pettys Minn. L. Rev. 92, 265, 2007 | 37 | 2007 |
Killing Roger coleman: Habeas, finality, and the innocence gap TE Pettys Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 48, 2313, 2006 | 34 | 2006 |
The Analytic Classroom TE Pettys Buff. L. Rev. 60, 1255, 2012 | 33 | 2012 |
Federal Habeas Relief and the New Tolerance for Reasonably Erroneous Applications of Federal Law TE Pettys Ohio St. LJ 63, 731, 2002 | 31 | 2002 |
Evidentiary Relevance, Morally Reasonable Verdicts, and Jury Nullification TE Pettys Iowa L. Rev. 86, 467, 2000 | 28 | 2000 |
Free expression, in-group bias, and the court's conservatives: A critique of the Epstein-Parker-Segal study TE Pettys Buff. L. Rev. 63, 1, 2015 | 24 | 2015 |
Choosing a Chief Justice: Presidential Prerogative or a Job for the Court TE Pettys JL & Pol. 22, 231, 2006 | 22 | 2006 |
Immoral Application of Exclusionary Rules, The TE Pettys Wis. L. REv., 463, 2008 | 19 | 2008 |
Instrumentalizing Jurors: An Argument Against the Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule TE Pettys Fordham Urb. LJ 37, 837, 2010 | 15 | 2010 |
Counsel and Confrontation TE Pettys Minn. L. Rev. 94, 201, 2009 | 15 | 2009 |
Judicial retention elections, the rule of law, and the rhetorical weakness of consequentialism TE Pettys Buff. L. Rev. 60, 69, 2012 | 14 | 2012 |
Our Anticompetitive Patriotism TE Pettys UC Davis L. Rev. 39, 1353, 2005 | 14 | 2005 |