Public Spheres in Interaction: Comment Sections of News Websites as Counterpublic Spaces F Toepfl, E Piwoni Journal of Communication 65 (3), 465–488, 2015 | 210 | 2015 |
Managing public outrage: Power, scandal, and new media in contemporary Russia F Toepfl New Media & Society 13 (8), 1301-1319, 2011 | 126 | 2011 |
The disconcerting potential of online disinformation: Persuasive effects of astroturfing comments and three strategies for inoculation against them T Zerback, F Töpfl, M Knöpfle New Media & Society 23 (5), 1080-1098, 2021 | 95 | 2021 |
From connective to collective action: internet elections as a digital tool to centralize and formalize protest in Russia F Toepfl Information, Communication & Society 21 (4), 531-547, 2018 | 77 | 2018 |
Four facets of critical news literacy in a non-democratic regime: How young Russians navigate their news F Toepfl European Journal of Communication 29 (1), 68-82, 2014 | 69 | 2014 |
Comparing authoritarian publics: The benefits and risks of three types of publics for autocrats F Toepfl Communication Theory 30 (2), 105-125, 2020 | 59 | 2020 |
Targeting dominant publics: How counterpublic commenters align their efforts with mainstream news F Toepfl, E Piwoni New Media & Society 20 (5), 2011-2027, 2018 | 57 | 2018 |
Innovating consultative authoritarianism: Internet votes as a novel digital tool to stabilize non-democratic rule in Russia F Toepfl New Media & Society 20 (3), 956-972, 2018 | 54 | 2018 |
Making Sense of the News in a Hybrid Regime: How Young Russians Decode State TV and an Oppositional Blog F Toepfl Journal of Communication 63 (2), 244–265, 2013 | 50 | 2013 |
Blogging for the sake of the president: The online diaries of Russian governors F Toepfl Europe-Asia Studies 64 (8), 1435-1459, 2012 | 45 | 2012 |
The “Gardening” of an Authoritarian Public at Large: How Russia’s Ruling Elites Transformed the Country’s Media Landscape After the 2011/12 Protests “For Fair Elections” A Litvinenko, F Toepfl Publizistik 64 (2), 225–240, 2019 | 37 | 2019 |
Querying the Internet as a mnemonic practice: how search engines mediate four types of past events in Russia A Zavadski, F Toepfl Media, Culture & Society 41 (1), 21–37, 2019 | 34 | 2019 |
Why do pluralistic media systems emerge? Comparing media change in the Czech Republic and in Russia after the collapse of communism F Toepfl Global Media and Communication 9 (3), 239-256, 2013 | 30 | 2013 |
Gauging reference and source bias over time: How Russia’s partially state-controlled search engine Yandex mediated an anti-regime protest event D Kravets, F Toepfl Information, Communication & Society 25 (15), 2207-2223, 2022 | 28 | 2022 |
Transferring control from the backend to the frontend: A comparison of the discourse architectures of comment sections on news websites across the post-Soviet world F Toepfl, A Litvinenko New Media & Society 20 (8), 2844-2861, 2018 | 25 | 2018 |
Who are the plotters behind the pandemic? Comparing Covid-19 conspiracy theories in Google search results across five key target countries of Russia’s foreign communication F Toepfl, D Kravets, A Ryzhova, A Beseler Information, Communication & Society 26 (10), 2033-2051, 2023 | 21 | 2023 |
Kosmopolitische Kommunikationswissenschaft: Plädoyer für eine „tiefe Internationalisierung “des Fachs in Deutschland: Ein wissenschaftspolitisches Positionspapier H Badr, M Behmer, S Fengler, A Fiedler, A Grüne, K Hafez, O Hahn, ... Publizistik 65, 295-303, 2020 | 17 | 2020 |
Mediensysteme in Transformationsprozessen F Töpfl Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2011 | 15 | 2011 |
Forged Examples as Disinformation: The Biasing Effects of Political Astroturfing Comments on Public Opinion Perceptions and How to Prevent Them T Zerback, F Töpfl Political Psychology 43 (3), 399-418, 2022 | 12 | 2022 |
Critically Commenting Publics as Authoritarian Input Institutions: How Citizens Comment Beneath their News in Azerbaijan, Russia, and Turkmenistan F Toepfl, A Litvinenko Journalism Studies 22 (4), 475-495, 2021 | 9 | 2021 |