| The constitution of a federal commonwealth: The making and meaning of the Australian constitution N Aroney Cambridge University Press, 2009 | 93 | 2009 |
| An uncommon court: how the High Court of Australia has undermined Australian federalism J Allan, N Aroney Sydney L. Rev. 30, 245, 2008 | 92 | 2008 |
| Shari'a in the West R Ahdar, N Aroney Oxford University Press, USA, 2010 | 89* | 2010 |
| Subsidiarity, federalism and the best constitution: Thomas Aquinas on city, province and empire N Aroney Law and Philosophy 26 (2), 161-228, 2007 | 76* | 2007 |
| Courts in federal countries: Federalists or unitarists? N Aroney, J Kincaid University of Toronto Press, 2017 | 64 | 2017 |
| A seductive plausibility: freedom of speech in the Constitution N Aroney University of Queensland Law Journal, The 18 (2), 249-274, 1995 | 58* | 1995 |
| The constitutional (in)validity of religious vilification laws: implications for their interpretation N Aroney Federal Law Review 34 (2), 287-318, 2006 | 53 | 2006 |
| Formation, representation and amendment in federal constitutions N Aroney The American Journal of Comparative Law 54 (2), 277-336, 2006 | 47* | 2006 |
| Subsidiarity in the Writings of Aristotle and Aquinas N Aroney Global perspectives on subsidiarity, 9-27, 2014 | 45 | 2014 |
| Freedom of Religion as an Associational Right N Aroney University of Queensland Law Journal 33, 153, 0 | 40* | |
| Constitutional choices in the work choices case, or what exactly is wrong with the reserved powers doctrine? N Aroney Melbourne University Law Review 32 (1), 1-43, 2008 | 35 | 2008 |
| Towards the 'best explanation' of the Constitution: text, structure, history and principle in Roach v Electoral Commissioner. N Aroney University of Queensland Law Journal 30 (1), 145-164, 2011 | 33 | 2011 |
| Justice McHugh, representative government and the elimination of balancing N Aroney Sydney Law Review 28 (3), 505-534, 2006 | 32* | 2006 |
| Freedom of Speech in the Constitution NT Aroney Centre for Independent Studies, 1998 | 31 | 1998 |
| Restraining elective dictatorship: the upper house solution? N Aroney, S Prasser, JR Nethercote University of Western Australia Press, 2008 | 30* | 2008 |
| A public choice? Federalism and the prospects of a Republican preamble. N Aroney TheUNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND LAW JOURNAL 20 (2), 262-293, 1999 | 29* | 1999 |
| Introduction and Comparative Conclusions NT Aroney, J Kincaid Courts in Federal Countries, 482-540, 2017 | 28* | 2017 |
| Religious freedom review: report of the expert panel P Ruddock, R Croucher, A Bennett, F Brennan, N Aroney Attorney-General's Department (Australia), 2018 | 26* | 2018 |
| The future of Australian federalism: Comparative and interdisciplinary perspectives G Appleby, N Aroney, T John Cambridge University Press, 2012 | 25 | 2012 |
| Four reasons for an upper house: representative democracy, public deliberation, legislative outputs and executive accountability. N Aroney TheADELAIDE LAW REVIEW 29 (2), 205-246, 2008 | 24 | 2008 |
Rex AhdarProfessor of Law, Otago UniversityVerified email at otago.ac.nz
