| Interpretation in international law A Bianchi, D Peat, M Windsor OUP Oxford, 2015 | 112* | 2015 |
| The use of court-appointed experts by the international court of justice D Peat British Yearbook of International Law 84 (1), 271-303, 2013 | 45* | 2013 |
| Comparative reasoning in international courts and tribunals D Peat Cambridge University Press, 2019 | 24 | 2019 |
| Playing the game of interpretation: on meaning and metaphor in international law D Peat, M Windsor Oxford University Press, 2015 | 18 | 2015 |
| Rhetoric, persuasion, and interpretation in international law I Scobbie, A Bianchi, D Peat, M Windsor Interpretation in international law, 61-77, 2015 | 18 | 2015 |
| The wrong rules for the right energy: the WTO SCM Agreement and subsidies for renewable energy D Peat | 14 | 2012 |
| Perception and process: Towards a behavioural theory of compliance D Peat Journal of International Dispute Settlement 13 (2), 179-209, 2022 | 10 | 2022 |
| Behavioural compliance theory D Peat, V Fikfak, E van der Zee Journal of International Dispute Settlement 13 (2), 167-178, 2022 | 10 | 2022 |
| Introduction to the symposium on limitations of the behavioral turn in international law E van der Zee, V Fikfak, D Peat Cambridge University Press 115, 237-241, 2021 | 8 | 2021 |
| Trade remedies in the renewable energy sector: normal value and double remedies C Barthelemy, D Peat the journal of world investment & trade 16 (3), 436-466, 2015 | 8 | 2015 |
| The perfect FIT: Lessons for renewable energy subsidies in the World Trade Organization D Peat LSU J. Energy L. & Resources 1, 43, 2012 | 8 | 2012 |
| Bias in International Law V Fikfak, D Peat, E van der Zee German Law Journal 23 (3), 281-297, 2022 | 7 | 2022 |
| International investment law and the public law analogy: The fallacies of the general principles method D Peat Journal of International Dispute Settlement 9 (4), 654-678, 2018 | 6 | 2018 |
| The Tyranny of Choice and the Interpretation of Standards: Why the ECtHR Uses Consensus D Peat New York University Journal of International Law and Politics (JILP …, 2019 | 4 | 2019 |
| Disciplining rules? Compliance, the rules of interpretation, and the evaluative dimension of Articles 31 and 32 of the VCLT D Peat Netherlands International Law Review 69 (2), 221-239, 2022 | 2 | 2022 |
| A contrario interpretation in the jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice AA Yusuf, D Peat Can. J. Comp. & Contemp. L. 3, 1, 2017 | 2 | 2017 |
| Interpreting reasons: the interpretation of the 1962 Temple of Preah Vihear judgment D Peat Hague Yearbook of International Law/Annuaire de La Haye de Droit …, 2013 | 2 | 2013 |
| The Interpretative Practice of the International Court of Justice SI Lekkas, P Merkouris, D Peat Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online 26 (1), 316-357, 2023 | 1 | 2023 |
| The Tyranny of Choice and the Interpretation of Standards: Why the European Court of Human Rights Uses Consensus D Peat NYUJ Int'l L. & Pol. 53, 381, 2020 | 1 | 2020 |
| Interpretation and domestic law: The prosecution of rape at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia D Peat Can. J. Comp. & Contemp. L. 3, 97, 2017 | 1 | 2017 |
Matthew WindsorAssociate Professor in Law, University of NottinghamVerified email at nottingham.ac.uk
