| The impact of focus particles on the recognition and rejection of contrastive alternatives Gotzner, Wartenburger, Spalek Language and Cognition 8, 59-95, 2016 | 68 | 2016 |
| Not only the apples: Focus sensitive particles improve memory for information-structural alternatives K Spalek, N Gotzner, I Wartenburger Journal of Memory and Language 70, 68-84, 2014 | 55 | 2014 |
| Experimenting with degree S Solt, N Gotzner Semantics and linguistic theory, 166-187, 2012 | 52 | 2012 |
| Scalar diversity, negative strengthening and adjectival semantics N Gotzner, S Solt, A Benz Frontiers in Psychology 3, 34, 2018 | 50 | 2018 |
| Alternative sets in language processing: How focus alternatives are represented in the mind N Gotzner Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition, 2017 | 43* | 2017 |
| How pitch accents and focus particles affect the recognition of contextual alternatives N Gotzner, K Spalek, I Wartenburger Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 35 (35), 2013 | 38 | 2013 |
| Intonation and pragmatic enrichment: How intonation constrains ad hoc scalar inferences JM Tomlinson Jr, N Gotzner, L Bott Language and Speech 60 (2), 200-223, 2017 | 33 | 2017 |
| The life and times of focus alternatives: Tracing the activation of alternatives to a focused constituent in language comprehension N Gotzner, K Spalek Language and Linguistics Compass 13 (2), e12310, 2019 | 31 | 2019 |
| The scalar inferences of strong scalar terms under negative quantifiers and constraints on the theory of alternatives N Gotzner, J Romoli Journal of Semantics 35 (1), 95-126, 2018 | 31 | 2018 |
| The Role of Contrastive and Non-Contrastive Associates in the Interpretation of Focus Particles N Gotzner, K Spalek Discourse Processes, 2016 | 27 | 2016 |
| Embedded implicatures revisited: Issues with the truth value judgment paradigm A Benz, N Gotzner Proceedings of the Formal & Experimental Pragmatics Workshop (European …, 2014 | 27 | 2014 |
| The best response paradigm: A new approach to test implicatures of complex sentences N Gotzner, A Benz Frontiers in Communication 2, 21, 2018 | 26* | 2018 |
| The role of focus intonation in implicature computation: a comparison with only and also N Gotzner Natural Language Semantics 27 (3), 189-226, 2019 | 25 | 2019 |
| What’s Included in the Set of Alternatives? Psycholinguistic evidence for a permissive view N Gotzner Sinn und Bedeutung 19, 232-247, 2015 | 22* | 2015 |
| Exhaustive inferences and additive presuppositions: The interplay of focus operators and contrastive intonation N Gotzner, K Spalek Proceedings of the Formal & Experimental Pragmatics Workshop (European …, 2014 | 22 | 2014 |
| Vagueness in implicature: the case of modified adjectives T Leffel, A Cremers, N Gotzner, J Romoli Journal of Semantics 36 (2), 317-348, 2019 | 21 | 2019 |
| Meaning and alternatives N Gotzner, J Romoli Annual Review of Linguistics 8, 213-234, 2022 | 18 | 2022 |
| The polarity asymmetry of negative strengthening: dissociating adjectival polarity from facethreatening potential D Mazzarella, N Gotzner Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6 (1), 2021 | 18 | 2021 |
| Face management and negative strengthening: The role of power relations, social distance, and gender N Gotzner, D Mazzarella Frontiers in psychology 12, 602977, 2021 | 15 | 2021 |
| The role of non-categorical relations in establishing focus alternative sets KA Joerdens, N Gotzner, K Spalek Language and cognition 12 (4), 729-754, 2020 | 11 | 2020 |
Isabell WartenburgerPatholinguistics/Neurocognition of Language, University of Potsdam, Cognitive Sciences, Dept. LingVerified email at uni-potsdam.de
