Chestnut Real Estate v. Huber

811 A. 2d 389, 148 Md. App. 190 - Md: Court of Special Appeals, 2002 - Google Scholar
… complicated questions ... connected with [property's] possession and enjoyment[]
have given rise to frequent applications for the exercise of the extraordinary aid of
equity by injunction." High on Injunctions, § 323 at 315. Again …

4215 HARDING ROAD HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION v. Harris

Tenn: Court of Appeals, 2012 - Google Scholar
… granting the relief it must be reasonably satisfied that there is actual intention on the part of the
defendant to do the act which it is sought to enjoin, or that there is probable ground for believing
that, unless the relief is granted, the act will be done." High on Injunctions, Section 22 …

EASTSIDE VEND v. PEPSI

913 A. 2d 50, 396 Md. 219 - Md: Court of Appeals, 2006 - Google Scholar
… 96, 105 (1882). It is well accepted that an interlocutory injunction should not be granted unless
the party seeking it demonstrates a likelihood of 64 success on the merits. 1 High on Injunctions §
5 (3d ed.1905); 43 CJS Injunctions §§ 17 and 20 (1978).". Armacost, 299 Md …

Bigley v. MSD of Wayne Tp. Schools

881 NE 2d 77 - Ind: Court of Appeals, 2008 - Google Scholar
… injunction. The rule is stated in High on Injunctions (4th Ed.) § 1663, as follows: `The
liability on an injunction bond is limited to such damages as arise from the suspension
or invasion of vested legal rights by the injunction. Speculative …

State v. Norris

50 P. 3d 595, 182 Or. App. 547 - Or: Court of Appeals, 2002 - Google Scholar
… The jurisdiction of equity in cases of purpresture, as well as of public nuisances, generally
rests in the necessity of preventing mischief and avoiding vexatious litigation. This remedy
is more efficacious than that at law: 1 High on Injunctions (4 ed.), § 759 …

EASTSIDE VEND DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP, INC.

Md: Court of Appeals, 2006 - Google Scholar
… 96, 105 (1882). It is well accepted that an interlocutory injunction should not be granted unless
the party seeking it demonstrates a likelihood of success on the merits. 1 High on Injunctions §
5 (3d ed. 1905); 43 CJS Injunctions §§ 17 and 20 (1978).". Armacost, 299 Md …

FAMILY TRUST SERVICES, LLC v. REO HOLDINGS, LLC

Tenn: Court of Appeals, 2017 - Google Scholar
… be implicitly obeyed, it is the spirit and not the strict letter of the mandate to which obedience is
exacted, and complainant failing to prove a violation of this to the satisfaction of the court, the
rule for an attachment for contempt will be discharged.' High on Injunctions, 4th Edition …

H & G ORTHO, INC. v. Neodontics Intern., Inc.

823 NE 2d 718 - Ind: Court of Appeals, 2005 - Google Scholar
… injunction. Id. The rule is stated in High on Injunctions (4th Ed.) § 1663, as follows:
The liability on an injunction bond is limited to such damages as arise from the
suspension or invasion of vested legal rights by the injunction …

H & G ORTHO, INC. v. NEODONTICS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Ind: Court of Appeals, 2005 - Google Scholar
… injunction. Id. The rule is stated in High on Injunctions (4th Ed.) § 1663, as follows:
The liability on an injunction bond is limited to such damages as arise from the
suspension or invasion of vested legal rights by the injunction …