[PDF][PDF] The economic development of Latin America and its principal problems
R Prebisch - 1962 - repositorio.cepal.org
R Prebisch
1962•repositorio.cepal.orgIn Latin America, reality is undermining the out-dated'schema of the international division of
labour, which achieved great importance in the nineteenth century and, as a theoretical
concept, continued to exert considerable-influence until very recently. Under that schema,
the specific task that fell to Latin America, as part of the periphery of the world economic
system, was that of producing food and raw materials for the great industrial centres. There
was no place within it for the industrialization of the new countries. It is nevertheless being …
labour, which achieved great importance in the nineteenth century and, as a theoretical
concept, continued to exert considerable-influence until very recently. Under that schema,
the specific task that fell to Latin America, as part of the periphery of the world economic
system, was that of producing food and raw materials for the great industrial centres. There
was no place within it for the industrialization of the new countries. It is nevertheless being …
In Latin America, reality is undermining the out-dated'schema of the international division of labour, which achieved great importance in the nineteenth century and, as a theoretical concept, continued to exert considerable-influence until very recently. Under that schema, the specific task that fell to Latin America, as part of the periphery of the world economic system, was that of producing food and raw materials for the great industrial centres.
There was no place within it for the industrialization of the new countries. It is nevertheless being forced upon them by events. Two world wars in a single generation and a great economic crisis between them have shown the Latin-American countries their opportunities, clearly pointing the way to industrial activity. The academic discussion, however, is far from ended. In economics, ideologies usually tend either to lag behind events or to outlive them. It is true that the reasoning on the economic advantages of the international division of labour is theoretically sound, but it is usually forgotten that it is based upon an assumption which has been conclusively proved false by facts. According to this assumption, the benefits of technical progress tend to be distributed alike over the whole community, either by the lowering of prices or the corresponding raising of incomes. The countries producing raw materials obtain their share of these benefits through international exchange, and therefore have no need to industrialize. If they were to do so, their lesser efficiency would result in their losing the conventional advantages of such exchange. The flaw in this asumption is that of generalizing from the particular. If by" the community" only the great industrial countries are meant, it is indeed true that the benefits of technical progress are gradually distributed among all social groups and classes. If, however, the concept of the community is extended to include the periphery of the world economy, a serious error is implicit in the generalization. The enormous benefits that derive from increased productivity have not reached the periphery in
repositorio.cepal.org
Showing the best result for this search. See all results