So wurde dieses Dokument zitiert
"To determine the likelihood of blurring,[courts look] to six factors, including:(i) the similarity of the marks;(ii) the similarity of the products covered;(iii) the sophistication of the consumers;(iv) the existence of predatory intent;(v) the renown of the senior mark; and (vi) the renown of the junior mark
- in Malletier v. Dooney & Bourke, Inc., 2004 und 48 ähnlichen Zitaten
Law § 360-l. "New York law accords protection against dilution to marks that are distinctive as a result of acquired secondary meaning as well as to those that are inherently distinctive."
- in De Beers LV Trademark Ltd. v. DeBeers Diamond Syndicate Inc., 2006 und 41 ähnlichen Zitaten
"Blurring occurs `where the defendant uses or modifies the plaintiff's trademark to identify the defendant's goods and services, raising the possibility that the mark will lose its ability to serve as a unique identifier of the plaintiff's product.'"
- in SHANDONG SHINHO FOOD INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. v. MAY FLOWER INTERNATIONAL, INC., 2021 und 35 ähnlichen Zitaten
"A dispute as to a material fact is `genuine,'and hence summary judgment is not appropriate, under this standard, only `if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.'"Id
- in Torain v. Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc., 2009 und 26 ähnlichen Zitaten
Law § 360-l. New York law protects against dilution by either blurring or tarnishment when marks are either inherently distinctive or distinctive as a result of secondary meaning.
- in Kuklachev v. Gelfman, 2009 und 16 ähnlichen Zitaten
—the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") sued the New York, New York Hotel in Las Vegas for use of an image of the NYSE 8Id.
- in Trademark: I Love You... You're Fired und 16 ähnlichen Zitaten
"Tarnishment occurs where a trademark is linked to products of shoddy quality, or is portrayed in an unwholesome or unsavory context, with the result that the public will associate the lack of quality or lack of prestige in the defendant's goods with the plaintiff's unrelated goods."
- in Navajo Nation v. Urban Outfitters, Inc., 2013 und 22 ähnlichen Zitaten
In the context of blurring, distinctiveness refers to the ability of the famous mark uniquely to identify a single source and thus maintain its selling power.
- in University of Kansas v. Sinks, 2008 und 19 ähnlichen Zitaten
"To determine the likelihood of dilution by blurring [under New York law], courts consider six factors similar to the Polaroid factors."
- in HAMILTON INTERN. LTD. v. VORTIC LLC, 2019 und 15 ähnlichen Zitaten
Rather, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the mark is inherently distinctive to prevail under the FTDA
- in Malletier v. DONKEY & BOURKE, INC., 2004 und 15 ähnlichen Zitaten
Zitiert von
228 F. Supp. 2d 399 - Dist. Court, SD New York 2002
221 F. Supp. 2d 410 - Dist. Court, SD New York 2002
Dist. Court, ND New York 2011
Dist. Court, SD New York 2008
561 F. Supp. 2d 368 - Dist. Court, SD New York 2008
215 F. Supp. 2d 273 - Dist. Court, SD New York 2002
Dist. Court, SD New York 2020
Dist. Court, SD New York 2019
Dist. Court, SD New York 2019
Dist. Court, SD New York 2018