How this document has been cited

Thus, whether alleging infringement of a registered trademark, pursuant to 15 USC § 1114 (1), or infringement of an unregistered trademark, pursuant to 15 USC § 1125 (a)(1), it is clear that a plaintiff must show that it has actually used the designation at issue as a trademark, and that the defendant has also used the same or a similar designation as a trademark.
—held that the act of obtaining a commonly misdialed variant of a mnemonic telephone number did not cause a likelihood of confusion.
For example, substituting the number one for the letter I (four on the dial) and, more commonly, substituting the number zero for the letter 0 (six on the dial).
—carries the same meaning or significance as the foreign language phrase. 81 Foreign surnames, however, should not be translated, but should be treated as surnames. 82 Commercial impressions created by foreign word marks are also considered in the test for likely confusion between marks. In the Bottega Veneta case, the Board found the mark BORSA VeNeTO for …
- in Trademark law: A practitioner's guide and one similar citation
—concluded that plaintiff Holiday Inns owned unregistered trademark rights in the vanity phone number 1–800–HOLIDAY used in connection with its hotel services,

Cited by

Dist. Court, D. New Jersey 2014
JC Smith… - 2018
INC SOLUTIONS -
M Barrett - 2008
315 F. 3d 932 - Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit 2003
DW Barnes… - Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. LJ, 2003
[CITATION] Trademark law: A practitioner's guide
SD Kane - 2002