The secondary drying stage of freeze drying: drying kinetics as a function of temperature and chamber pressure
MJ Pikal, S Shah, ML Roy, R Putman - International journal of …, 1990 - Elsevier
MJ Pikal, S Shah, ML Roy, R Putman
International journal of pharmaceutics, 1990•ElsevierSecondary drying involves removal of water which did not freeze. This report emphasizes
the phenomenological description of the effects of temperature and chamber pressure on
the kinetics of drying. A crystalline solute (mannitol) and two amorphous solutes
(moxalactam di-sodium and povidone) were selected for study. Drying kinetics were
determined gravimetrically using a vacuum microbalance and by Karl Fischer assay of vials
sealed at selected times during secondary drying experiments conducted in a laboratory …
the phenomenological description of the effects of temperature and chamber pressure on
the kinetics of drying. A crystalline solute (mannitol) and two amorphous solutes
(moxalactam di-sodium and povidone) were selected for study. Drying kinetics were
determined gravimetrically using a vacuum microbalance and by Karl Fischer assay of vials
sealed at selected times during secondary drying experiments conducted in a laboratory …
Abstract
Secondary drying involves removal of water which did not freeze. This report emphasizes the phenomenological description of the effects of temperature and chamber pressure on the kinetics of drying. A crystalline solute (mannitol) and two amorphous solutes (moxalactam di-sodium and povidone) were selected for study. Drying kinetics were determined gravimetrically using a vacuum microbalance and by Karl Fischer assay of vials sealed at selected times during secondary drying experiments conducted in a laboratory scale freeze dryer. The main observations may be summarized as follows: (1) the water content decreases rapidly during the first few hours of drying and then appears to approach a plateau level of residual water which far exceeds the equilibrium water content calculated from the desorption isotherm data and the measured partial pressure of water in the drying chamber; (2) this plateau level of water sharply decreases as the drying temperature is increased; (3) the drying rate increases as the product specific surface area increases; and (4) variations in chamber pressure (0–0.2 mmHg) and dried product thickness have little or no effect on drying rate. We conclude that the rate-limiting mass transfer process for drying an amorphous solid is either evaporation at the solid/vapor interface or diffusion in the solid, probably the former. The ‘plateau level kinetics’ appears to be consistent with amorphous particle size heterogeneity superimposed on a simple model based on Fickian diffusion with rate controlling surface evaporation.
Elsevier